UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Five contentious ways Canada could be doing more for Syria

By Pieta Woolley


The first rush of the 31,000 Syrian refugees has arrived across Canada. In both big cities and small towns, in churches and even summer camps, Canadians are learning about the horrors of the conflict from regular folk who have fled Syria.

For those of us who aren’t from the Middle East, having neighbours that are makes watching the bombs rain down on Aleppo even more excruciating. In an Observer blog post, “The Globalization of Indifference,” former NDP MP Dennis Gruending calls for Canada and the U.S. to take a greater role in settling the world’s 65 million refugees and ending armed conflicts. That we have a moral obligation to do something is obvious. But what we should do is less so.

Here are five contentious ways Canada could be doing more for Syria.

1. Take in far more refugees


Do it because: We can, as it doesn’t cost much. Other countries, such as Germany, settle far more than what Canada has offered. In fact, wealthy countries, such as Canada, settle less than one percent of the world’s registered displaced people, whereas already-stressed countries host the most refugees.

Don’t do it because: Most Canadians don’t want more Syrian refugees.

2. A bigger military role against ISIS

Do it because: In February, Canada ended its bombing mission against ISIS. At the time, most Canadians wanted the bombing missions to continue or even increase. Just one in 10 Canadians wanted Canada to end its military role against ISIS entirely

Don’t do it because:
It’s expensive, and as the Huffington Post’s Joe Killoran writes, “Canadian leaders also have a responsibility to ensure any mission which endangers Canadian lives has clear, realistic and worthwhile objectives. Fighting ISIS does not meet this standard.”

3. Send more aid money

Do it because: Canada has committed $1.6 billion over three years for Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon — over and above other aid commitments. Even so, Canada’s foreign aid package is half of what it was in 1975 in today’s dollars and represents far less of our GDP than the UN target of 0.7 percent, which many European countries meet.

Don’t do it because: Canada has more pressing needs at home. What’s more, aid money isn’t audited well.

4. Ensure leadership roles for Syrian women


Do it because: The Syrian Women’s Initiative for Peace and Democracy has a plan for peace but isn’t funded internationally and can’t afford to be at the meeting to negotiate ceasefires and peace agreements.

Don’t do it because: Nope. No one seems to be arguing against this one — for now.

5. Remove Russia from the UN Human Rights Council


Do it because: MP Irwin Cotler, who founded the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, is urging Canada to vote against reinstating Russia on the council on the basis of its anti-civilian violence in both Syria and Ukraine.

Don’t do it because: While no Canadian has publicly argued in favour of Russia staying on this particular council, Foreign Affairs Minister Stephane Dion argued earlier this year that "Canada's severing of ties with Russia had no positive consequences for anyone, not for Canadians, not for the Russian people, not for Ukraine and not for global security."


Author's photo
Pieta Woolley is a writer in Powell River, B.C.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

Outrage is the new normal

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: A Tale of Two Cancers

by Observer Staff

Catherine Gordon's October 2017 feature for The Observer, 'A tale of two cancers,' recently caught the eye of U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders and his Washington, D.C.-based team, and inspired a short documentary. Gordon talks about the experience of writing the article and participating in the film.

Promotional Image

Profiles

October 2017

Fall from grace

by Justin Dallaire

Don Hume was a United Church minister nearing retirement. Then he tried crack cocaine.

Faith

September 2017

Yearning

by Jane Dawson

Restless longing is at the core of the human condition, urging us onward through life. What happens when it veers off course?

Society

July 2017

From far and wide

by Various Writers

Meet 11 immigrants who are putting down new roots

Faith

October 2017

A tale of two cancers

by Catherine Gordon

One year after the writer discovered she had breast cancer, her sister in California received the same diagnosis. They both recovered, but their experiences were worlds apart.

World

June 2017

Resisting genocide

by Sally Armstrong

In August 2014, ISIS attacked Iraq’s Yazidis, slaughtering thousands and forcing women and girls into sexual slavery. Today, the survivors are fighting for their ancient way of life.

Society

April 2017

Dear Grandkids

by Various Writers

Six acclaimed Canadian authors write letters from the heart

Promotional Image